Cases 1 - 10 of 57
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. RANBAXY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv10356
Defendant:
Ranbaxy U.S.A. Inc., Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited, Ranbaxy Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Cesar Castillo, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10357
Defendant:
Ranbaxy U.S.A. Inc., Ranbaxy Inc., RANBAXY LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Louisiana Health Services and Indemnity Company et al v. Ranbaxy, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10274
Defendant:
Ranbaxy, USA, Inc., Ranbaxy Laboratories, LTD, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
HMO Louisiana, Inc. and Louisiana Health Services and Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Meijer, Inc. et al v. Ranbaxy Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12129
Plaintiff:
Meijer Distribution, Inc. and Meijer, Inc.
Defendant:
Ranbaxy U.S.A. Inc., Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited, Ranbaxy Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
MEIJER INC. et al v. RANBAXY, INC. et al
as 1:2017mc91266
Plaintiff:
MEIJER INC. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Inc., RANBAXY LABORATORIES, LTD., Ranbaxy U.S.A. Inc. and others
Respondent:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Endo Health Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
MEIJER, INC. et al v. RANBAXY, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv11066
Petitioner:
Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Respondent:
Ranbaxy Inc., RANBAXY LABORATORIES, LTD., Ranbaxy U.S.A. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Prinston Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Meijer, Inc., et al v. Ranbaxy Inc., et al
as 17-8008
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC. and MEIJER, INC.
Defendant:
RANBAXY U.S.A. INC. and RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD.
Defendant - Petitioner:
RANBAXY INC. and SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2005
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, SUPERVALU, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Interested Party:
CAREMARKPCS, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY and others
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2006
Plaintiff:
SUPERVALU, INC., VALUE DRUG COMPANY, KROGER COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, MICHIGAN REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND, A.F. OF L. - A.G.C. BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN and others
Interested Party:
CAREMARKPCS, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, A.F. OF L. - A.G.C. BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN, FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE MIAMI LODGE 20 INSURANCE TRUST FUND and others
Plaintiff:
WALGREEN CO., KROGER COMPANY, SAFEWAY INCORPORATED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE and others
Interested Party:
CAREMARKPCS HEALTH, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Intervenor:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
