Cases 31 - 40 of 150
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY, BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WALGREEN CO., KROGER COMPANY, SAFEWAY INCORPORATED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE and others
Interested Party:
CAREMARKPCS HEALTH, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Intervenor:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY, BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 345 HEALTH CARE FUND, WALGREEN CO., KROGER COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE and others
Interested Party:
CAREMARKPCS HEALTH, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Intervenor:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC., AMERICAN ANTITRUST INSTITUTE and others
Vista Healthplan Inc, et al v. Cephalon Inc, et al
as 15-8085
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
VISTA HEALTHPLAN INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Respondent:
CEPHALON INC, BARR LABORATORIES INC, MYLAN LABORATORIES INC and others
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 14-1522
Defendant / Appellant:
RANBAXY INC., RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SUPERVALU, INC., MEIJER, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Interested Party:
JONATHAN RICH, EDWARD BREIVIK, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ANTITRUST INSTITUTE, US PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE ASSOCIATION FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES and others
Intervenor:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
City of Providence v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00271
Plaintiff:
City of Providence, Rhode Island
Defendant:
Cephalon, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cesar Castillo, Inc. v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al
as 1:2015cv03505
Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al v. Ranbaxy Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01526
Plaintiff:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Novartis AG
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Inc. and Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
In re: Lipitor Antitrust Lit
as 14-4632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RP HEALTHCARE INC, CHIMES PHARMACY INC, JAMES CLAYWORTH, R.Ph., DBA Clayworth Pharmacy and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS INC, RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD, RANBAXY INC and others
In re: Lipitor Antitrust Lit
as 14-4602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
A.F OF L A G C BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PFIZER INC, PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS, WARNER LAMBERT CO and others
RANBAXY LABORATORIES, LTD et al v. BURWELL et al
as 1:2014mc01313
Plaintiff:
RANBAXY LABORATORIES, LTD and RANBAXY, INC.
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, MARGARET HAMBURG and UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
