Cases 1 - 10 of 328
Zelesnik et al v. President Joe Biden et al
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
President Joe Biden, Senator Rand Paul, Senator Chuck Schumer and others
Lopez Andino v. Garland
as 24-1881
Petitioner:
DARWIN RAND LOPEZ ANDINO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
ENDRES v. AIR CANADA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ENDRES
Defendant:
AIR CANADA, INC., AIR FRANCE-KLM S.A., ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ALHABBAL et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
RAED ALHABBAL, SHIRIN KALABIB, LUJAIN AL HABBAL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Zelesnik v. Murphy et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Chris Murphy, Paul Rand, Chris C Glynn and others
Softketeers, Inc. v. Regal West Corporation, et al.
as 24-451
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOFTKETEERS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
REGAL WEST CORPORATION, VU HO INC., THAI TRAN INC. and others
Zelesnik v. Paul et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Senator Rand Paul and Cincinnati Mayor Aftab Pureval
Softketeers, Inc. v. Regal West Corporation, et al.
as 24-150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SOFTKETEERS, INC., a California corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
REGAL WEST CORPORATION, a Washington corporation doing business as Regal Logistics Inc, VU HO INC., THAI TRAN INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Forbes v. Rand et al
as 4:2023cv13131
Plaintiff:
Walter Ferdinand Forbes
Defendant:
Michael Rand and Melvin Hardman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
