Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Templeton et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2022cv09631
Plaintiff:
Jerry W. Templeton, Dennis Higgins, George Nunnery and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Pikk, et al v. Pedersen, et al
as 15-4001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT PIKK, derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant ZAGG Inc. and DANIEL L. ROSENBERG, derivatively and on behalf of ZAGG Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT G. PEDERSEN, II, EDWARD EKSTROM, RANDALL HALES and others
Defendant:
SHUICHIRO UEYAMA
Swabb, et al v. ZAGG, Inc., et al
as 14-4026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD SWABB, SWABB FAMILY TRUST, SCOTT BOYD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ZAGG, INC., RANDALL HALES, ROBERT G. PEDERSEN and others
Rosenberg v. Pedersen et al
as 2:2012cv01216
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Rosenberg
Defendant:
Robert G. Pedersen, II, Randall Hales, Brandon T. O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Pikk v. Pedersen et al
as 2:2012cv01188
Plaintiff:
Albert Pikk
Defendant:
Robert G. Pedersen, Edward Ekstrom, Randall Hales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Securities & Exchange Commiss
Draayer v. Zagg et al
as 2:2012cv00859
Plaintiff:
Ryan Draayer
Defendant:
Zagg, Randall Hales, Robert G. Pederson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Apple v. Zagg et al
as 2:2012cv00852
Plaintiff:
James H. Apple
Defendant:
Zagg , Randall Hales , Robert G. Pedersen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Hale v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2009cv00112
Petitioner:
Brady Randall Hale
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hale v. Quarterman
as 6:2009cv00042
Petitioner:
Brady Randall Hale
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
