Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jordan v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03519
Petitioner:
Randall Scott Jordan
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. v. Houston et al
as 6:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Randall Houston, Kortnie Dickerson, Brandon Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Jordan v. Lumpkin
as 1:2021cv00089
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Randall Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jordan v. Davis
as 1:2020cv00182
Respondent:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Randall Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jordan v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 7:2019cv00101
Respondent:
Director TDCJ - CID
Petitioner:
Randall Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Furniture Row Express, LLC
as 4:2015cv00079
Defendant:
Furniture Row Express, LLC and Lynn Martell
Plaintiff:
Randall Scott
Counter_claimant:
Furniture Row Express, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Randall Scott
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Furniture Row Express, LLC
Third_party_defendant:
Integrity Towing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Jordan v. Stephens
as 1:2014cv00671
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Randall Scott Jordan
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2014cv00337
Petitioner:
Randall Scott Jordan
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jordan v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2014cv00557
Petitioner:
Randall Scott Jordan
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
