Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Spencer v. Sykes et al
as 4:2017cv00305
Plaintiff:
Randy G Spencer
Defendant:
Sykes , Angelo , Hannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Pash et al
as 5:2017cv06051
Plaintiff:
Randy G Spencer
Defendant:
Ronda Pash , Lora Lakey , Shannon Tyrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Pash et al
as 5:2017cv06052
Plaintiff:
Randy G Spencer
Defendant:
Ronda Pash , Lora Lakey , Stacy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Kuttenkuler et al
as 2:2017cv04063
Plaintiff:
Randy G Spencer
Defendant:
Christina Kuttenkuler , Cyndi Prudden , Allen Earls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Pash et al
as 5:2014cv06051
Plaintiff:
Randy G Spencer
Defendant:
Ronda Pash, Lori Lakey, Matameyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Sharp et al
as 2:2013cv04192
Plaintiff:
Randy G Spencer
Defendant:
Vernon Sharp, Patrick Fitzgerald, Christus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv04183
Plaintiff:
Randy G Spencer
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Christine Kuttenkuler, Cyndi Prudden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Spencer v. MO Depart. of Corrections, et al
as 12-3944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Randy G. Spencer
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Dwayne Kempker, Bill Harris and others
Randy Spencer v. Jackson County Missouri, et al
as 12-1532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Randy G. Spencer
Defendant - Appellee:
Jackson County Missouri, Kenneth Conley, Carter and others
Spencer v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2011cv06020
Plaintiff:
Randy G Spencer
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Jackson Institutional Dental Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
