Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Stellmacher et al v. Hepp et al
as 2:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Lee H Stellmacher and Jeffery L Larson
Defendant:
John J Maggioncalda, Michael Sponholz, Mark Schomish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Litscher et al
as 2:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Crandall Henderson
Defendant:
Jon Litscher, Randall Hepp, Chris Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Ledford v. Michael Baenen, et al
as 19-1694
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM N. LEDFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE ABHOLD, SMA CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, AMY E. BASTEN and others
Peaker v. Litscher et al
as 2:2019cv00293
Defendant:
Randy Mattison, John/Jane Does, J Labelle and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Peaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanatta v. Litscher et al
as 3:2018cv00901
Defendant:
Dr. Charles Larson, L. Bartow, Jon E. Litscher and others
Plaintiff:
Damen Neil Vanatta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lieder v. Litscher et al
as 2:2018cv01615
Defendant:
Julie Ludwig, Steven L Sisbach, J Labelle and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Anthony Lieder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanatta v. Litscher et al
as 2:2018cv00929
Plaintiff:
Damen Neil Vanatta
Defendant:
Jon E Litscher , Randall R Hepp, Chris Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens, Allan v. Litscher, Jon et al
as 3:2017cv00611
Plaintiff:
Allan Dean Owens
Defendant:
Jon Litscher , Randall Hepp, Chris Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ledford v. Baenen et al
as 2:2016cv00665
Plaintiff:
William N Ledford
Defendant:
Michael Baenen , Chris Timmers, Amy Basten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Baenen et al
as 2:2015cv00395
Plaintiff:
Dwayne A Cox
Defendant:
Michael Baenen , Yana Pusich, Amy Basten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
