Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hernandez v. Raphael Industries Inc
as 2:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hernandez
Defendant:
Raphael Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Love v. The Catholic Diocese of Jackson et al
as 2:2021cv00876
Plaintiff:
Raphael Love
Defendant:
The Catholic Diocese of Jackson, Franciscan Friars Assumption BVM Province Inc, Paul West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White et al v. Carr et al
as 2:2021cv00317
Defendant:
July Ludwig, Michael Rivers, Crystal Merchant and others
Plaintiff:
Michael G White, Ronald Schilling, Raphael D Turner, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornelius v. Brown County et al
as 2:2016cv00666
Plaintiff:
Justin D Cornelius
Defendant:
Brown County, CO Berendsen, Raphael Santana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Data Key Partners v. Permira Advisers LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00688
Plaintiff:
Data Key Partners
Defendant:
Permira Advisers LLC , Raphael Holding Company , Raphael Acquisition Corp. and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Plato Learning, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
McDonald, Michael v. Paul, Judith et al
as 3:2011cv00690
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald
Defendant:
Judith Ames Paul, Terrance D. Paul, Glenn R. James and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Plato Learning, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
United States of America v. Baenon
as 3:2010cv00719
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Raphael Baenon
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Maddox v. Dennison et al
as 3:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
Raphael Maddox
Defendant:
Penny Dennison, Bret Reynolds, Jager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox v. Cornia
as 3:2009cv00683
Plaintiff:
Raphael Maddox
Defendant:
Reed Cornia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
