Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Williams v. Peters et al
as 2:2020cv00680
Defendant:
Kenneth Peters and LaTonya Scott
Plaintiff:
Demarkules Raphael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny Lopez v. Raphael William
as 11-1457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RAPHAEL WILLIAMS, Warden
DuPree v. Jane Doe 1 et al
as 1:2010cv00351
Plaintiff:
John Randolph DuPree, Sr.
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Perry Phelps, Raphael Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Taylor et al
as 1:2009cv00476
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Vasquez
Defendant:
Stan Taylor, Raphael Williams and Oluwemi Awodiya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Davis, III v. Raphael Williams, et al
as 09-2602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM F. DAVIS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
RAPHAEL WILLIAMS, FIRST CORR MED DE, DR BOSTON and others
William Davis, III v. Correctional Med Systems, et al
as 08-4880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM F. DAVIS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CORR MED SER, FIRST CORR MED DE, STATE OF DE and others
McGill v. Williams et al
as 1:2007cv00839
Plaintiff:
Acrecious McGill
Defendant:
Raphael Williams, Anne, Gassner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yost v. Williams et al
as 1:2007cv00838
Petitioner:
Michael E. Yost
Respondent:
Raphael Williams and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Attorney General of State of Delaware et al
as 1:2007cv00837
Petitioner:
Ronald G. Johnson
Respondent:
Attorney General of State of Delaware and Raphael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Biden et al
as 1:2007cv00836
Petitioner:
James E. Brown
Respondent:
Joseph R. Biden and Raphael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
