Cases 1 - 10 of 11
James Campbell v. Rappahanock Regional Jail
as 23-6000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CODY CAMPBELL
Defendant / Appellee:
RAPPAHANOCK REGIONAL JAIL
Campbell v. Rappahanock Regional Jail
as 1:2022cv01376
Plaintiff:
James Cody Campbell
Defendant:
Rappahanock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Cassie Crisano v. Rappahanock Regional Jail
as 22-6130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSIE C. CRISANO
Defendant / Appellee:
RAPPAHANOCK REGIONAL JAIL, PHIL GRIMES, Superintendent (Retired and REBECCA NORRIS, Administrator of the Estate of Houston Norris
Crisano v. Rappahanock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2019cv01391
Defendant:
Rappahanock Regional Jail and Phil D. Grimes
Plaintiff:
Cassie C. Crisano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crisano v. Rappahanock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2019cv00734
Defendant:
Sgt. Adcok, Co. Redding, CpL Minnick and others
Plaintiff:
Cassie C. Crisano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Olsen et al
as 1:2014cv01437
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Eric L. Olsen, Stafford County Sheriff's Office and Rappahanock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Lee et al
as 1:2014cv01395
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Deputy Lee, Roanoke City Sheriff's Office, Timothy Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pace v. Higgs et al
as 1:2014cv01234
Plaintiff:
Jerritt Pace
Defendant:
Joseph Higgs, Jr., Phil Grimes, Lynn Balamuta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owaiian Jones v. President of the United State
as 14-7370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA and others
Jones v. Rappahanock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2014cv01150
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Rappahanock Regional Jail, Joseph Higgs and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
