Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ritter v. Calavan Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram et al
as 1:2023cv05943
Plaintiff:
Rasheed S. Ritter and Rasheed Ritter
Defendant:
Calavan Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram, Chrysler Capital, Bank Of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ritter v. Rick Hendrick Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram Duluth et al
as 1:2023cv05641
Plaintiff:
Rasheed S. Ritter
Defendant:
Rick Hendrick Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram Duluth, Hendrick Automotive Group and Route One
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Ritter v. Verizon
as 2:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Ritter
Defendant:
Verizon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wingo v. Maddox
as 1:2022cv04686
Petitioner:
Rasheed Wingo
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wingo v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv04411
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Wingo
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox and Randy Akies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Milk and Honey at Wesley Chapel, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03231
Plaintiff:
Alexis White, Amir Benjamin, Kenetra White and others
Defendant:
Milk and Honey at Wesley Chapel, LLC, Michael Epps, Deon Lamar Harrison and others
RASHEED v. NELSON et al
as 1:2019cv00124
Plaintiff:
ASMAR SHALABY RASHEED, SR
Defendant:
OFFICER TIMOTHY DAVIS, SGT SHONDRA CARTHORNE and P A ERNEST NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
