Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Brian Kasangaki v. William Barr, et al
as 19-50810
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, ACTING SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ANDREW HURON, San Antonio Assistant Field Office Director for Pearsall Texas South Texas Detention Complex and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN KASANGAKI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00465
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00464
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00390
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01241
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01209
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01116
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MEJIA et al v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2018cv02096
Defendant:
L. FRANCIS CISSNA, DANIEL BIBLE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff:
E.G.S. and MARTA ALICIA MEJIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUENAS-CLAROS et al v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2018cv01923
Defendant:
KEVIN M. MCALEENAN, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, DANIEL BIBLE and others
Plaintiff:
L.M.D. and LEYDI DUENAS-CLAROS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00440
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
