Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Steven Cody v. Ray Hobb
as 10-2580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven D. Cody
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Obama v. Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 6:2010cv06054
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Hassan Obama
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Gaylon Lay, Michael Moseley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Obama v. Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 1:2010cv06054
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Hassan Obama
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Gaylon Lay, Michael Moseley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrick Nooner v. Ray Hobb
as 10-2434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Terrick Terrell Nooner
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Johnny Craig v. Ray Hobb
as 10-2435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Johnny Lee Craig
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Alfonzo Hendrix v. Ray Hobb
as 10-2419
Petitioner - Appellant:
Alfonzo Hendrix
Respondent - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Michael Douglas v. Ray Hobb
as 10-2294
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael L. Douglas
Respondent - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
James White v. Ray Hobb
as 10-2214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James White
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Wilmoth v. Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
as 5:2010cv05094
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Wilmoth
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ben Grimes, Jr. v. Ray Hobb
as 10-2026
Petitioner:
Ben W. Grimes, Jr.
Respondent:
Ray Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
