Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Hines v. Rosado et al
as 4:2024cv04025
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hines
Defendant:
Raymond Rosado, Howard Moore and Antonio Urquiola Cortinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Redshirt v. Fluke et al
as 5:2023cv05063
Petitioner:
Raymond John Redshirt
Respondent:
Warden Brent Fluke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond v. Minnehaha County State Attorney Office et al
as 4:2021cv04175
Plaintiff:
Andre Gerald Raymond
Defendant:
Minnehaha County State Attorney Office, Strange, Farrell, Johnson & Brewers, P.C. and Amber J. Eggert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond v. Von Wald et al
as 1:2021cv01015
Plaintiff:
Roger Allen Raymond
Defendant:
Judge Jack R. Von Wald, Harvey Oliver, Ken Varns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teague v. Shawnee County et al
as 4:2021cv04042
Defendant:
Shawnee County, Kayla Roehler and Laura Kelly
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ellis Teague, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teague v. The State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2021cv04031
Defendant:
Elhers, Tashara Lynn Anderson and State of South Dakota
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ellis Teague, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teague v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2021cv04030
Defendant:
Minnehaha County Jail Medical and State of South Dakota
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ellis Teague, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keys v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv01013
Plaintiff:
Dashown Raymond Keys
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Elliott
as 5:2019cv05034
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Raymond D. Elliott
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Elliott v. Freddie Mac et al
as 5:2018cv05086
Defendant:
Residential Credit Solutions, GMAC, Freddie Mac and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Elliott and Raymond Elliott
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
