Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Danny Singleton v. Mississippi Department of Corr, et al
as 16-60371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY SINGLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARSHALL L. FISHER, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICIALS, All and others
Winding v. Fisher et al
as 3:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Jerry Williams, Tony Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff v. Fisher et al
as 1:2015cv00402
Plaintiff:
Barron J. Goff
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Unknown Beffaurd, Unknown Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaVan Yankton v. Raymond Byrd
as 15-60787
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAVAN YANKTON, also known as LaVan Yakton
Respondent - Appellee:
RAYMOND BYRD, Warden, Wilkinson County Correctional Facility
La Tidtus Jones v. Ron King, et al
as 15-60613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LA TIDTUS JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
RON KING, Superintendent South Mississippi Correctional Institution, HUBERT DAVIS, Deputy Warden South Mississippi Correctional Institution, BRENDA SIMS, Captain South Mississippi Correctional Institution and others
Hill v. Fisher et al
as 1:2015cv00220
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Jerry Williams, Raymond Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston v. Fisher et al
as 3:2015cv00486
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Johnston
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Christopher Epps, Jerry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cochran v. Byrd
as 4:2015cv00067
Petitioner:
Michael Cochran
Respondent:
Raymond Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cochran v. Byrd
as 1:2015cv00156
Plaintiff:
Michael Cochran
Defendant:
Raymond Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stroud v. Byrd et al
as 1:2015cv00148
Plaintiff:
Jason Joaquin Stroud
Defendant:
Raymond Byrd, Hubert Davis, A. Stockstill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
