Cases 1 - 10 of 42
In re: Dewayne Jackson
as 14-1830
Petitioner - Petitioner:
In re: DEWAYNE JACKSON
Respondent - Respondent:
RAYMOND M. LAWLER and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
JACKSON v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2014cv00401
Petitioner:
DEWAYNE JACKSON
Respondent:
RAYMOND M. LAWLER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Encarnacion-Rivera v. Raymond Lawler, et al
as 13-2132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ENCARNACION-RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND M. LAWLER and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Frank Desan v. Raymond Lawler, et al
as 12-2949
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK DESAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND M. LAWLER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Frank Desan v. Commonwealth of PA
as 11-4236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK DESAN
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, RAYMOND M. LAWLER, DA DELAWARE COUNTY and others
Louis Rocco v. Raymond Lawler, et al
as 11-3571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS JAMES ROCCO
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND M. LAWLER and ATTY GEN PA
PENNINGTON v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2011cv00905
Petitioner:
GARY LYNELL PENNINGTON
Respondent:
RAYMOND M. LAWLER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROADUS v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2011cv00105
Petitioner:
CORDELL DUANE BROADUS
Respondent:
RAYMOND M. LAWLER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lance v. Lawler et al
as 3:2010cv02481
Petitioner:
Thomas Lance
Respondent:
Raymond M. Lawler and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BURKETT v. LAWLER et al
as 3:2010cv00270
Petitioner:
WAYNE PAUL BURKETT
Respondent:
RAYMOND M. LAWLER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THOMAS CORBETT
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BLAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
