Cases 1 - 10 of 54
McCollum v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
Portia McCollum and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Robert K. Ortberg, Frederic G. Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Keritsis v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01351
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff:
George Keritsis
Defendant:
Gregory Hayes, Tracy A. Atkinson, Leanne G. Caret and others
McCollum v. Hayes et al
as 3:2023cv01414
Plaintiff:
Portia McCollum and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Robert K. Ortberg, Frederic G. Reynolds and others
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Ferran v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01220
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Technologies Corporation and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jose R. Ferran, III
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Neil Mitchill, Anthony F. O'Brien and others
New England Teamsters Pension Fund v. RTX Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01274
Plaintiff:
New England Teamsters Pension Fund
Defendant:
RTX Corporation, Gregory Hayes, Neil Mitchill and others
Petitioner:
William Chow, Westchester Putnam Counties Heavy & Highway Laborers Local 60 Benefits Fund and United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers & Allied Workers Local Union No. 8 WBPA Fund
Peneycad v. RTX Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01035
Defendant:
RTX Corporation, Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Gregory Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Peneycad
Interested Party:
New England Teamsters Pension Fund
Town of Norwell v. 3M Company et al
as MA/1:23-CV-11115
Defendant:
3M Company, RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.) and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Norwell
Lea-Max Corporation v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
LEA-MAX CORPORATION
Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation, The Pullman Company and Gould Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
BOROUGH OF WEST CHESTER, PENNSYLVANIA v. 3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.) et al
as PAE/2:22-CV-00525
Plaintiff:
BOROUGH OF WEST CHESTER, PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.), AGC, INC. (f/k/a Asahi Glass Co., Ltd.), AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
