Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Stith v. Michael S. Rea, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00436
Defendant:
MICHAEL S REA, DAVID HESS, Michael S. Rea, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUI STITH, SR and Marqui Stith, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 4.68 Acres, more or less, in the city of Suffolk, Virginia PLEASE FILE IN CASE 3:17-cv-814-JAG ONLY!
as 2:2018cv00386
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
4.68 Acres, more or less, in the city of Suffolk, Virginia, located on parcel identification no. 23*24A*1, collectively known, et al and Thomas Rea Rountree
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Phelps v. REA Magnet Wire Company, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00854
Plaintiff:
Donald O. Phelps
Defendant:
REA Magnet Wire Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Potter, Jr. v. Lee et al
as 1:2015cv00695
Plaintiff:
Isaac A. Potter, Jr.
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee, Jennifer Krisp, Roberta A. Bren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROUDABUSH v. MENSAH et al
as 2:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant:
F. MENSAH, D. Lawhorne, Stern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROUDABUSH v. MENSAH et al
as 2:2013cv00646
Plaintiff:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant:
F. MENSAH, D. Lawhorne, STEARNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Potter v. Bren et al
as 3:2013cv00738
Plaintiff:
Isaac A. Potter, Jr.
Defendant:
Roberta S. Bren, Oblon Spivak, Teresa Stanek Rea and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Potter v. Bren et al
as 1:2013cv01417
Plaintiff:
Isaac A. Potter, Jr.
Defendant:
Roberta S. Bren, Oblon Spivak, Teresa Stanek Rea and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
ZEIDMAN v. REA
as 1:2013cv01341
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Zeidman
Defendant:
Teresa Stanek Rea
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
