Cases 31 - 40 of 158
Read v. Medical Data Systems, Inc.
as 6:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Medical Data Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Emily Read
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Continental Casualty Company et al v. Macon Inc.
as 4:2020cv00086
Plaintiff:
Continental Casualty Company, Valley Forge Insurance Company and American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania
Defendant:
Macon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv00024
Plaintiff:
Read Baggett Kelly
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Read v. TDCJ Director et al
as 5:2019cv00106
Defendant:
TDCJ Director, John Floyd and State Counsel for Offenders
Plaintiff:
Donald W Read
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MME Holding Company, LLC d/b/a Midas Muffler v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Co et al
as 3:2019cv00156
Defendant:
James Reading, Vericlaim, Inc. and Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Co
Plaintiff:
MME Holding Company, LLC d/b/a Midas Muffler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
Donald Read v. Texas Board of Pardon & Parole, et al
as 19-10428
Defendant / Appellee:
JIM LAFANER, JR., Board Member, RAYMOND GONZALES, Board Member and TEXAS BOARD OF PARDON & PAROLE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD W. READ
Read v. Texas Board of Pardon and Parole et al
as 5:2019cv00040
Defendant:
Jim LaFaner, Jr., Texas Board of Pardon and Parole and Raymond Gonzales
Plaintiff:
Donald W Read
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Read v. Texas State Bar Association, et al
as 19-10210
Defendant / Appellee:
TEXAS STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, BILL REESE, E. HSU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD W. READ
Donald Read v. Lorie Naylor
as 19-10167
Defendant / Appellee:
LORIE NAYLOR, CDC2 Court Reporter
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD W. READ
Donald Read v. Brian Collier
as 19-10122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD WAYNE READ
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN COLLIER, TDCJ Executive Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
