Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Rodriguez v. Burnett et al
as 1:2022cv10056
Plaintiff:
Ralph Rodriguez
Defendant:
Edward R. Burnett, John Doe #1, Stephen Urbanski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Burnett et al
as 1:2022cv02198
Plaintiff:
Ralph Rodriguez
Defendant:
Edward Burnett, Akinola Franci Akinyombo, Davachi M. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ream et al v. Philips RS North America LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00912
Plaintiff:
Cloyd R Ream and Marie C Ream
Defendant:
Philips RS North America LLC, Philips North America LLC and Philips Holding USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Houston v. Capra et al
as 1:2020cv02135
Defendant:
Anne Marie McGrath, Ruth Brown, Jeff McKoy and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Annucci et al
as 9:2019cv01339
Defendant:
Davis, Sgt. Andino, Sally Reams and others
Plaintiff:
John Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kotler v. Bosco et al
as 1:2017cv04954
Plaintiff:
Kerry Kotler
Defendant:
Robert Cunningham, William Connolly, John Doe #7 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Fishkill Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2017cv01123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dixon
Defendant:
Fishkill Correctional Facility, Department of Security Services, S. Urbanskt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kotler v. Boley et al
as 1:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
Kerry Kotler
Defendant:
C. Boley, J. Carreras, K. Chauvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Cunningham et al
as 1:2016cv09861
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dixon
Defendant:
Robert Cunningham, Sally Reams, Urbanski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Cunningham et al
as 6:2016cv06732
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dixon
Defendant:
Robert Cunningham, Sally Reams, Urbanski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
