Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Reese et al v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00481
Plaintiff:
Terry Reese and Erika Reese
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chappell v. Northern Neck Regional Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
William Chappell
Defendant:
Northern Neck Regional Jail, William Reese, Keith Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewers et al v. City of Petersburg, Virginia
as 3:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ewers , James Aponte , William Bergamini and others
Defendant:
City of Petersburg, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reese v. Seaspan Ship Management, Ltd. et al
as 2:2015cv00550
Plaintiff:
Terry Reese
Defendant:
Seaspan Ship Management, Ltd. and MOL (America), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reese v. McCabe et al
as 2:2015cv00441
Plaintiff:
Tyrell A. Reese, Sr.
Defendant:
Bob McCabe, Deputy Owens and Deputy Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton v. Mabus et al
as 1:2015cv00905
Plaintiff:
Robert Newton
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Stacy Lynn Shook, Bryan Beardsley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Reese v. Stolle et al
as 2:2015cv00274
Plaintiff:
Tyrell A. Reese, Sr.
Defendant:
Ken Stolle, Conmed Healthcare Management Inc. and Naph Care Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America, for the use and benefit of James B. Reese v. Fleming, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00271
Plaintiff:
United States of America, for the use and benefit of James B. Reese
Defendant:
Douglas P. Fleming, LLC and The Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133
Reese v. Mcabb et al
as 2:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
Tyrell A. Reese, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Bob Mcabb, Deputy Owens and Deputy Mitchel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
