Cases 51 - 60 of 521
Noah Schroder v. Corizon Medical, et al
as 22-35778
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOAH SCHRODER
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON MEDICAL, ZAKROFF, PA REESE and others
Moore v. Bugher et al
as 6:2022cv01472
Plaintiff:
Gordon Talbert Moore
Defendant:
Joe Bugher, Dr. Warren Roberts, Tia Bullock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04912
Plaintiff:
Reese Conner and Conner Reese
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanders v. Castaneda et al
as 2:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Timothy Sanders
Defendant:
Castaneda, W. Hutching, J. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggie v. USA
as 4:2022cv00356
Petitioner:
Colin Reese Diggie
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Marshall Richmond v. Michael Reese, et al
as 22-35568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL REESE, Multnomah County Sheriff, STEVEN ALEXANDER and KURTISS MORRISON
Michael Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04986
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson, Kevin Patton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35530
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Parks et al
as 3:2022cv00924
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lee Johnson, II
Defendant:
Capt. Parks, Deputy Bull, Deputy Talalemotu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
