Cases 71 - 80 of 83
Haney v. Blumenauer et al
as 3:2011cv00989
Defendant:
Gregory E Abel, Wedge Abels, Sam Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Azonia Haney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Karboau v. City of Portland et al
as 6:2011cv00679
Defendant:
Patrick Callahan, City of Portland, County of Multnomah Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Milaudi Karboau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2011cv00523
Defendant:
City of Portland, Graf, Greaves and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth P. Morrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richmond v. U.S. Government et al
as 3:2011cv00209
Defendant:
Gary Barbour, Bret Barnum, Pat Bender and others
Plaintiff:
Marshall C. Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Commercial Adjustment Co.
as 3:2010cv00766
Defendant:
Commercial Adjustment Co.
Plaintiff:
Willard Reese
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sony Music Entertainment et al v. Reese
as 6:2009cv06113
Plaintiff:
Sony Music Entertainment, Sony Music Entertainment, Sony Music Entertainment and others
Defendant:
Alexandra Reese
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Lopez v. Kennedy et al
as 3:2008cv00706
Plaintiff:
Herminio Lopez
Defendant:
Charlotte Reese Kennedy, Mark Lawrence, Ronald Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Emmons et al
as 6:2008cv06122
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Angus Emmons, John Coggins, Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Mills
as 3:2007cv01723
Petitioner:
Michael Lloyd Reese
Respondent:
Don Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reese v. Mills
as 3:2007cv00879
Petitioner:
Michael Lloyd Reese
Respondent:
Don Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
