Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Allen v. Well Path Health et al
as 1:2023cv03044
Plaintiff:
Reggie Deshawn Allen
Defendant:
Well Path Health and Well Star Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loyal v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Loyal
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Robert Roberson, Marcus Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01376
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
LOCKETT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 7:2020cv00024
Plaintiff:
REGGIE LOCKETT
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reggie v. 7Hops.com Inc.
as 1:2019cv05762
Defendant:
7Hops.com Inc.
Plaintiff:
Denis Reggie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Tabor v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv05531
Plaintiff:
Celisa Tabor
Defendant:
Reginald Johnson, Claude S. Lett, Ted Philbin and others
Bane v. Southeast Correctional Medical Group, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00178
Defendant:
Southeast Correctional Medical Group, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation, LEE COUNTY GEORGIA, REGGIE RACHALS and others
Plaintiff:
Hannah Bane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANE v. SOUTHEAST CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL GROUP INC et al
as 1:2019cv00179
Plaintiff:
Hannah Bane, DESIREE BANE and DEIDRE TILLMAN
Defendant:
J. Does 1-10, LEE COUNTY GEORGIA, Reggie Rachals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynn v. Caldwell et al
as 6:2018cv00123
Respondent:
Reggie A. Lampkin and Warden Antoine G. Caldwell
Undetermined:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
James Lynn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOCKETT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
REGGIE LOCKETT
Defendant:
BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
