Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Jackson v. Baidoo
as 21-20135
Defendant / Appellee:
James A. Baidoo, Correctional Officer, Major Julia M. Rodriguez and Captain Garrett R. Simmons
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reidie James Jackson
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 3:2021cv00031
Petitioner:
Reidie Jackson and Reidie James Jackson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2021cv00021
Petitioner:
Reidie Jackson and Reidie James Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Pittman
as 20-40832
Defendant / Appellee:
Lieutenant Jaquez Reed, Captain Amanda K. Buchanek, Kristi L. Pittman, Senior Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reidie James Jackson
Jackson v. Baidoo et al
as 4:2020cv03920
Defendant:
Major Julia M Rodriguez, Captain Garrett R Simmons and James A Baidoo
Plaintiff:
Reidie James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Pittman et al
as 4:2020cv02496
Defendant:
Captian Amanda K Buchanek, Lieutenant Jaquez Reed, C.O. Weligni Gmagnipone and others
Plaintiff:
Reidie James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reidie Jackson v. Ray Cruz, et al
as 19-10158
Defendant / Appellee:
DIANA MCBROOM, Correctional Officer V, RAY CRUZ, Captain of Correctional Officers, DELORIS CARRIZALES, LVN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REIDIE JACKSON, also known as Reidie James Jackson
Reidie Jackson v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-40109
Petitioner - Appellant:
REIDIE JAMES JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Jackson v. Stephens
as 3:2016cv00082
Petitioner:
Reidie James Jackson
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reidie Jackson v. Darryl Glenn
as 14-10806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REIDIE JACKSON, also known as Reidie James Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRYL E. GLENN, Law Library Supervisor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
