Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bensouda v. Relentless, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv00140
Plaintiff:
Aziz Bensouda
Defendant:
Relentless, Inc., Seafreeze Fleet, LLC and Seafreeze Limited
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Relentless Inc., et al v. US Dep't of Commerce, et al
as 25-1845
Plaintiff:
RELENTLESS INC., HUNTRESS INC. and SEAFREEZE FLEET LLC
Defendant:
US DEPT OF COMMERCE, HOWARD W. LUTNICK, in the official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER, INC., MANHATTAN INSTITUTE and others
Petitioner:
CATO INSTITUTE and BUCKEYE INSTITUTE
Relentless Inc., et al v. US Dep't of Commerce, et al
as 21-1886
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RELENTLESS, INC., HUNTRESS, INC. and SEAFREEZE FLEET LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPT OF COMMERCE, WILBUR ROSS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Relentless Inc et al v. U.S. Department of Commerce et al
as 1:2020cv00108
Plaintiff:
Seafreeze Fleet LLC, Huntress, Inc and Relentless Inc
Defendant:
Neil Jacobs, Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Doyle, et al v. Huntress, Inc., et al
as 07-1506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY DOYLE, GREG HAGAMAN, BRIAN LAGUE and others
Defendant:
GREG BRAY and KYLE GOODWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTRESS, INC. and RELENTLESS, INC.
Doyle, et al v. Huntress, Inc., et al
as 07-1396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY DOYLE, GREG HAGAMAN, BRIAN LAGUE and others
Defendant:
GREG BRAY and KYLE GOODWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTRESS, INC. and RELENTLESS, INC.
Traudt, et al v. Huntress, Inc., et al
as 1:2003cv00241
Plaintiff:
Scott Traudt , Neal Gartner , James. McNulty and others
Defendant:
Huntress, Inc and Relentless Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
