Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Gee v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04535
Plaintiff:
Rena Gee
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Altman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00736
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Renae Altman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rager v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv01200
Plaintiff:
Sarah Renae Rager
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
graham v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2019cv03461
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
renae marie graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spears-Kenard v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2017cv00319
Plaintiff:
Rena Spears-Kenard
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Boddie v. City of Lima, Ohio et al
as 3:2016cv01850
Plaintiff:
Joyce Boddie
Defendant:
City of Lima, Ohio , Lima Police Department , Kevin Davhon Godsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Napier v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016oe00651
Plaintiff:
Erica Rena Napier
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Napier v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00650
Plaintiff:
Erica Rena Napier
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Bonecutter et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02149
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bonecutter, Jr. and Darlene Renae Bonecutter
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitnable v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00250
Plaintiff:
Tamala Renae Whitnable
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
