Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rene Hernandez v. Todd Pipe and Supply, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv07892
Plaintiff:
Rene Hernandez
Defendant:
Todd Pipe & Supply, LLC, Todd Pipe Holdings, Inc., Morsco Supply, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Chirix v. Lupe's East L.A. Kitchen, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00819
Plaintiff:
Jose Eduardo Chirix
Defendant:
Lupe's East L.A. Kitchen, Inc. , David Seixas and Rene Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hernandez v. Merrill. Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
as 3:2017cv01181
Plaintiff:
Rene Hernandez
Defendant:
Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LARA v. INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv20864
Plaintiff:
RONALD LARA
Defendant:
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, INC. and RENE HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Vintimilla v. A&J Iron Works, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02691
Defendant:
A&J Iron Works, Inc. and Rene Hernandez
Plaintiff:
Jaime Vintimilla
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cadena et al v. K.K. & D Rest. Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv04299
Plaintiff:
Saul Cadena , Imelda Arroyo Rodriguez , Teodoro Cruz Dolores and others
Defendant:
K.K. & D Rest. Corp., Sergios Deposits, Soteroulla Deposits and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
CARDOSA et al v. PETER FOODS, LLC d/b/a COMPARE FOODS et al
as 1:2011cv01127
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN M. CARDOSA , JESUS F. MENDEZ , MELINDA ABONZA-GALARZA and others
Defendant:
PETER FOODS, LLC, 1233 FOODS, LLC, 2000 FOODS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hernandez et al v. Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv08472
Plaintiff:
Rene Hernandez , Rebecca Heston , Jeffrey Steinberg and others
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. , Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
