Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Resolute Forest Products, Inc. et al v. Greenpeace International et al
as 1:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
Resolute Forest Products, Inc. , Resolute FP US, Inc. , Resolute FP Augusta, LLC and others
Defendant:
Greenpeace International, Greenpeace, Inc., Greenpeace Fund, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Reynolds et al v. Resolute Forest Products, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 1:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Donald Reynolds , Norman Yarber and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Resolute Forest Products, Inc., Resolute FP US Inc., Resolute FP US Health and Welfare Benefit Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al
as 1:2014cv02103
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and THOMAS J. VILSACK
Plaintiff:
RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Jackson v. Resolute FP Augusta LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
Howard Jackson
Defendant:
Resolute FP Augusta LLC , Resolute Forest Products, Inc. , Resolute FP US Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NorthStar Direct, LLC v. Resolute Forest Products Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00395
Plaintiff:
NorthStar Direct, LLC
Defendant:
Resolute FP US Inc. and Resolute Forest Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Assoc. of American Railroads v. Department of Transportation, et al
as 12-5204
Amicus Curiae:
Association of Independent Passenger Rail Operators, Resolute Forest Products Inc., Judicial Education Project and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Railroad Administration, Anthony Foxx, In his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation, United States Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Association of American Railroads
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
