Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Bracaloni v. Smoak et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Noah Zachary Bracaloni
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Nurse Mindy, Nurse Evelyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNealy v. Smoak et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Vantavious Dwight Montez McNealy
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Nurse Mindy, Nurse Evelyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Calloway, et al
as 5:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Stephen Dewayne Gray and Stephen Dewyane Gray
Defendant:
Rhonda Calloway, Sgt. Morris, Sgt. Sykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammonds v. Callaway et al
as 5:2021cv00064
Respondent:
Rhonda Callaway and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner:
Carlos Hammonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Jackson et al
as 4:2019cv01089
Plaintiff:
Carson Michael Walker
Defendant:
Rhonda Jackson, Dewayne Amos, Scott Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00526
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Jennings
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moore v. Holiday et al
as 5:2015cv00801
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Gail Moore
Defendant:
Angela Holiday, Colbert County Jail, Tuscumbia City Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Quality Corrections Health Care et al
as 5:2015cv00802
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Gail Moore
Defendant:
Quality Corrections Health Care, Tuscumbia City Jail, Colbert County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2014cv00189
Petitioner:
Jessie Scott
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Alvin Speights and Rhonda McMillian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robinson v. Moulton et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2013cv00766
Plaintiff:
James L. Robinson
Defendant:
Kevin Moulton, Michael Conaway, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
