Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RPM Living v. Braggs
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
RPM Living
Defendant:
Ricardo Dwayne Braggs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HAMILTON v. WORTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 5:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
RICARDO HAMILTON
Defendant:
WORTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and DEPUTY DAVID SHELER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
FORD v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
RICARDO FORD
Defendant:
INVESTIGATOR STEPHANIE BRYANT, INVESTIGATOR CHRISTOPHER ELLISON and JOHN OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00150
Petitioner:
Ricardo Villanueva Rios
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Edwin v. Carter
as 3:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Ricardo Keith Edwin
Respondent:
Sidney Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Villanueva-Rios v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv03555
Petitioner:
Ricardo Villanueva-Rios
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Strozier v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Jamal Strozier
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Robert Toole, Stan Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Genesys Health Alliance et al
as 5:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ricardo M. Mobley
Defendant:
Genesys Health Alliance and Dr. Caraviello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
