Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ricardo Ayala v. Syncreon. US, Inc.
as 2:2023cv04561
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ayala, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and Ricardo Ayala
Defendant:
Syncreon. US, Inc. and SYNCREON TECHNOLOGY (USA), LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 133
Ayala v. Woodcraft Interiors Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02559
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ayala
Defendant:
Woodcraft Interiors Inc. and Nissim Baron
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ricardo Ayala-Negrete v. William Barr
as 20-70335
Petitioner:
RICARDO AYALA-NEGRETE
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Ricardo Ayala-Negrete v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-70721
Petitioner:
RICARDO AYALA-NEGRETE
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Pizarro v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv06506
Plaintiff:
Jose Pizarro, Edwin Hernandez, Antonio Chavarria and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, John/Jane Doe, Monica Windley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohning et al v. The City and State of New York
as 1:2017cv06441
Plaintiff:
Peter Bohning, Jose Pizarro, Juel Roundtree and others
Defendant:
The City and State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricardo Ayala-Negrete v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-72869
Petitioner:
RICARDO AYALA-NEGRETE
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Ricardo Ayala-Ortiz v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-71831
Petitioner:
RICARDO AYALA-ORTIZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
ABARCA et al v. COOK et al
as 1:2013at00753
Plaintiff:
ARTURO ABARCA , CRISTINA ABARCA, DENISE ABARCA and others
Petitioner:
LISA EDDINGS-ROSS, CHRISTIE HAMILTON, BRANDON HENSON and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co. Inc., Baltimore Aircoil Company and Amsted Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ricardo Ayala-Negrete v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-72305
Petitioner:
RICARDO AYALA-NEGRETE
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
