Cases 1 - 10 of 14
William Richard v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 22-1197
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM H. RICHARD
Defendant / Appellant:
RANDY PFISTER, Warden, RICARDO TEJEDA, Assistant Warden and ROB JEFFREYS, in his official capacity as Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections
Romero v. Godinez et al
as 3:2018cv02044
Defendant:
Lt Davis, David Gomez, Michael Lemke and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Godinez et al
as 1:2018cv06671
Defendant:
David Gomez, Michael Lemke, Counselor Eilts and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caruth v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv10340
Plaintiff:
James Caruth
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, S.A. Godinez, Donald Stolworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caruth v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv10339
Plaintiff:
James Caruth
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, S.A. Godinez, Donald Stolworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piercy v. Wilhelmi et al
as 2:2016mc00015
Plaintiff:
Aaron Piercy
Defendant:
Kelly Wilhelmi, Dan Williams , Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Piercy v. Wilhelmi et al
as 1:2016mc01008
Plaintiff:
Aaron Piercy
Defendant:
Kelly Wilhelmi, Julie Warkins , Dan Williams and others
Piercy v. Wilhelmi et al
as 3:2016mc00043
Plaintiff:
Aaron Piercy
Defendant:
Kelly Wilhelmi, Dan Williams , Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Karim v. Lemke et al
as 1:2015cv04803
Plaintiff:
Samuel Karim
Defendant:
Michael Lemke, Tarry Williams, Troy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Best et al
as 1:2014cv07207
Plaintiff:
Daniel V. Diaz
Defendant:
Charles Best, John Hurst, LT. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
