Cases 1 - 10 of 2,269
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company v. Lou Budke's Arrow Finance Company et al
as 4:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lou Budke's Arrow Finance Company d/b/a Arrow Finance Company and Richard Kyles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monderen v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonia Young-Griffin, Timothy Seabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Richard McBride
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Courtney v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00627
Petitioner:
Antonio Courtney
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reavis v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05030
Plaintiff:
Richard Reavis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moser et al v. Club Car Wash Operating, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04058
Plaintiff:
David Moser and Richard Adams
Defendant:
Club Car Wash Operating, LLC and Roland Bartels
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Okiri v. Certain Trucking, Ltd. et al
as 3:2024cv05026
Plaintiff:
Damilola Okiri
Defendant:
Certain Trucking, Ltd. and Richard Ken Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
