Cases 1 - 9 of 9
JACKSON v. SCHOUPPE et al
as 2:2017cv01135
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EUGENE JACKSON, II
Defendant:
WILLIAM SCHOUPPE, JENNIFER MONZA, THOMAS TRKULJA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A & B Campbell Family et al v. Chesakpeake Energy Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
A & B Campbell Family , Eugene J Barrett, Jr. , Lori R Barrett and others
Defendant:
Chesakpeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia,L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. HEWITT-JACKSON et al
as 2:2013cv00788
Plaintiff:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DEBORAH J. HEWITT-JACKSON, RICHARD C. JACKSON and D.R.J.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JACKSON v. SCHOUPPE et al
as 2:2012cv00298
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. JACKSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM SCHOUPPE, MARIO MONAC and DANTE DECANINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61087
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. JACKSON and MARY LORENE JACKSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC. , GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52503
Plaintiff:
RICHARD H. JACKSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
JACKSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70930
Plaintiff:
RICHARD H. JACKSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. OWENS-CORNING et al
as 2:2007cv65997
Plaintiff:
RICHARD T. JACKSON
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., FAIRBANKS-MORSE, ENGINE DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
