Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wright v. Vangorder et al
as 3:2021cv00187
Defendant:
Vickie Vangorder, Luzerne County SPCA, Garry S. Taroli and others
Plaintiff:
Adolph-Richard Ott Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Luzerne County et al
as 3:2020cv00051
Defendant:
Jane M Arci, Michaul A Shocosky and Luzerne County
Plaintiff:
Adolph Richard Ott Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WRIGHT v. TRANSTAR et al
as 2:2011cv64085
Plaintiff:
RICHARD M. WRIGHT
Defendant:
TRANSTAR , U.S.X. CORP. , WYANDOTTE TRANSPORTATION CO. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
U.S.X. CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHNS MANVILLE FUND , A. P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WRIGHT v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv42574
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. WRIGHT
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WRIGHT v. AMERCARGO INC. et. al.
as 2:2010cv42573
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. WRIGHT
Defendant:
AMERCARGO INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WRIGHT et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv66073
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. WRIGHT
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., FLEXITALLIC, INC., GAF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. DION et al
as 2:2008cv04911
Plaintiff:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GARY M. DION and RICHARD H. WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WRIGHT v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv66811
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LEE WRIGHT and RICHARD LEE WRIGHT
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WRIGHT v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv73883
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. WRIGHT
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., THE BUDD COMPANY, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
