Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kado Renfro v. Richard Alexander et al
as 1:2023cv05690
Plaintiff:
Kado Renfro
Defendant:
Richard Alexander and Judge Warren Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crisp v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Tuwanda Rush Williams, Brittanie Browning, David D. Pritchett and others
Plaintiff:
Sergeant Nathan D. Crisp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. Dynasty Marketing Group, LLC
as 2:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Richard Alexander
Defendant:
Dynasty Marketing Group, LLC doing business as Dynasty Vacation Club
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
SWINFORD v. SANTOS et al
as 3:2021cv00090
Plaintiff:
JAYNE' SWINFORD
Defendant:
OFFICER JOSHUA SANTOS, OFFICER CHARLES BIDINGER, OFFICER ROGER OLIVER WILLIAMS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kademi, LLC et al v. Equifax, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03886
Plaintiff:
Kademi, LLC , Superior Services Investment Group, LLC , Forest Express Properties, LLC and others
Defendant:
Equifax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vaughn v. Conway et al
as 1:2016cv00501
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Alan Vaughn
Defendant:
Butch Conway, Danny Porter, Marlene Zester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Conway et al
as 1:2016cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Alan Vaughn
Defendant:
Butch Conway, Richard Alexander, Danny Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv03518
Plaintiff:
Chris B. Chatman
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Daniel J. Porter and Richard Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv03345
Plaintiff:
Howard Anderson Lee
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Richard Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redford v. Gwinnett County Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2014cv03226
Plaintiff:
Mike Redford
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Judicial Circuit and Richard Alexander, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
