Cases 1 - 10 of 34
LIMA v. CARTER et al
as 1:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN LIMA
Defendant:
CARTER, TEAH and RUNYON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. DOBBS
as 1:2022cv00756
Petitioner:
RICHARD ALLEN MITCHELL
Respondent:
BYRAN DOBBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cope v. Michigan City City of et al
as 3:2021cv00667
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Cope
Defendant:
Michigan City City of, Marty Corley, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. LaPorte County et al
as 3:2021cv00633
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Cope
Defendant:
LaPorte County, John Boyd and Tyra Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. St. Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00357
Defendant:
Julie Lawson, Classifaction, St. Joseph County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen White, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAFFER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv00176
Defendant:
WILLIAM WILSON, KRUEGER, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN SHAFFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spann-El v. Indiana The State of et al
as 3:2020cv00806
Plaintiff:
Richard A Spann-El and Richard Allen Spann El
Defendant:
Hyatte, Payne, Carty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spann v. Indiana The State of et al
as 3:2020cv00785
Plaintiff:
Richard A Spann, Richard Spann, Richard Allen Spann El and others
Defendant:
Elkhart County Court House Clerk, Curtis Hill and Indiana The State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spann v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2020cv00760
Plaintiff:
Richard A Spann, Richard Allen Spann El and Richard A Spann-El
Defendant:
William Hyatte, Curtis Hill, MCF Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spann v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2020cv00761
Plaintiff:
Richard A Spann, Richard Allen Spann El and Richard A Spann-El
Defendant:
Bennet, Indiana State of, Curtis Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
