Cases 1 - 10 of 48
O'Coulean v. Smith
as 24-74
Petitioner / Appellant:
RIK O'COULEAN and Richard Collins
Respondent / Appellee:
S. SMITH
Richard Collins v. S. Smith
as 5:2023cv02263
Petitioner:
Richard Collins
Respondent:
S Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Smith
as 3:2023cv01989
Petitioner:
Richard Collins
Defendant:
S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonard v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv08562
Defendant:
President Joseph R. Biden, United States of America, Biden Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Laverne M. Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leonard v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv08571
Defendant:
President Joseph R. Biden, United States of America, Joseph A. Biden, aka Joseph Robinettte Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Laverne M. Leonard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Collins v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv15359
Plaintiff:
Richard Collins
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richard Collins v. Jim Robertson et al
as 5:2022cv00755
Petitioner:
Richard Collins
Respondent:
Jim Robertson and San Bernardino County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Robertson et al
as 3:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
Richard Collins
Respondent:
Jim Robertson and San Bernardino County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glenn Glatz v. Ronald Newcomb, et al
as 21-6188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLENN FRED GLATZ
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD CROCKETT NEWCOMB, DAVID B. RAUSCH, in his official capacity, EDWARD CANTRELL MILLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
