Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HAILE v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION et al
as 3:2018cv01377
Plaintiff:
JOHN S HAILE
Defendant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF IOWA, PLANNED PARENTHOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony DeNoma v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DENOMA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. KASICH, TED STRICKLAND, GARY C. MOHR, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) and others
DeNoma v. Kasich et al
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeNoma
Defendant:
John R. Kasich, Ted Strickland, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virgil Smith v. Warden Toledo Correctional Ins, et al
as 11-4037
Petitioner - Appellant:
VIRGIL SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN TOLEDO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and RICHARD CORDRAY
Brian Doliboa v. Warden US Penitentiary Terre H, et al
as 11-3369
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN DOLIBOA
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN US PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTIONS and RICHARD CORDRAY, Ohio Attorney General
Botts v. Pfieffer et. al.
as 2:2011cv00006
Petitioner:
Terrance Lynn Botts
Respondent:
Beverly Pfieffer, State Of Ohio, Mark Dann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
El Bey v. Ruppert et al
as 3:2010cv00132
Plaintiff:
Olakwesu Y. El Bey
Defendant:
James D. Ruppert and Richard Cordray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davies v. Cordray
as 1:2010cv00099
Petitioner:
Robert Davies
Respondent:
Richard Cordray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davies v. Cordray
as 1:2009cv02255
Petitioner:
Robert R. Davies
Respondent:
Richard Cordray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ealy v. Ruppert et al
as 3:2009cv00155
Petitioner:
Larry E. Ealy
Respondent:
James D. Ruppert and Richard Cordray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
