Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Smith v. Futch et al
as 1:2021cv00056
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Jackson County Circuit Court, David Futch and Wendy Neviels
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00950
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Barnes
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Southern Stone, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00588
Defendant:
Southern Stone, LLC, Richard Earl, Anthony Duckworth and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker v. Sheriff et al
as 3:2018cv00564
Defendant:
Prosecutor Mary Cotton, Judge Benny K. Warrington, Sheriff Investigator Terry Gann and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baker v. Shaw et al
as 3:2018cv00573
Defendant:
Lt. Cassandra Davis, Deputy Warden Chaz White, Warden Unknown Shaw and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Sheriff et al
as 3:2018cv00401
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Baker
Defendant:
Jacob Sheriff, Ceasar Felton, Chaz White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Watson et al
as 3:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Barker
Defendant:
Unknown Watson, John Does, Unknown Muhammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Unknown Yazoo County Jail Medical Officials et al
as 3:2016cv00782
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Barker
Defendant:
Unknown Yazoo County Jail Medical Officials, Unknown Thomas, Unknown Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Brown et al
as 1:2009cv00660
Plaintiff:
Blewett William Thomas
Defendant:
William Earl Brown, Carol A. Brown, Ira Steve Herrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
