Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-55619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richard Moreno v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 09-55469
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD GEORGE MORENO
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and SYLVIA GARCIA
Johnson v. State of Oregon
as 3:2009cv00136
Plaintiff:
Richard George Johnson
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Trustees Of The Construction Industry And Laborers Health and Welfare Trust et al v. Franklin
as 2:2009cv00170
Plaintiff:
Trustees Of The Construction Industry And Laborers Health and Welfare Trust, Trustees Of The Construction Industry And Laborers Health and Welfare Trust, Trustees Of The Construction Industry And Laborers Health and Welfare Trust and others
Defendant:
Richard George Franklin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Richard G Moreno v. Silvia Garcia
as 2:2003cv09000
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of California and Sylvia Garcia
Petitioner:
Richard George Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv04673
Plaintiff:
Richard George
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation et al v. Richard George Franklin et al
as 2:2007cv05621
Plaintiff:
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation, Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation, Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation and others
Defendant:
Richard George Franklin and Does
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
George v. United States Of America
as 3:2007cv01369
Plaintiff:
Richard George
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
