Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Richard Morrison v. CCA Corr - Civil, et al
as 21-11754
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, U.S. ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, CCA CORR - CIVIL, Coffee's Private Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MORRISON
Richard Morrison v. 11th Circuit U.S. Court of App, et al
as 20-14208
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE, 11TH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MORRISON
Richard Morrison v. Warden
as 19-12039
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD MORRISON
Richard Morrison v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-4242
Petitioner:
RICHARD MORRISON
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
INTEGRATED CLINICAL SYSTEMS, INC. v. COMPREHEND SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv07017
Plaintiff:
INTEGRATED CLINICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
COMPREHEND SYSTEMS, INC. and RICHARD MORRISON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Dietz v. Dietz
as 1:2011cv01692
Plaintiff:
Anne Bennett Morrison Dietz
Defendant:
John Ford Dietz
Interested_party:
Richard Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Richard Morrison
as 11-11827
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD MORRISON
Morrison v. Dietz
as 3:2009cv05467
Plaintiff:
Richard Morrison
Defendant:
John F. Dietz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Commty Agnst Runway, et al v. FAA
as 02-1267
Petitioner:
Communities Against Runway Expansion, Inc., Richard J. Rodes, Mary Ellen Welch and others
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration
Intervenor For Respondent:
Massachusetts Port Authority
Intervenor For Petitioner:
City of Boston
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
