Cases 61 - 70 of 177
Contreras v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv01222
Plaintiff:
Adam Chavez Contreras
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Management and Training Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Ryan et al
as 3:2018cv08084
Petitioner:
Edward F Parks
Respondent:
Charles Ryan, Richard Pratt and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cox v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv01177
Plaintiff:
Walter John Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Carla Hacker-Agnew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
James Eldon Rogers
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Corizon Health Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coppess v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
Wellington Spencer Coppess
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Corizon Correctional Health Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv00481
Plaintiff:
Patrick Newman
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Kevin Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderson Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jobe v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv00254
Plaintiff:
William L Jobe
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Corizon Health Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres-Montes v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00015
Plaintiff:
Jose Torres-Montes
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health, Leo Easley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes #065373 v. Corizon Health Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04624
Plaintiff:
William Eric Stokes, Sr.
Defendant:
Corizon Health Incorporated, Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
