Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Charron et al v. Harrison et al
as 1:2012cv01345
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Charron , Denise Charron and Mark Laurange
Defendant:
David W. Harrison, Jr. , John Doe, Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Rodriguez v. Bubnis et al
as 6:2011cv01436
Plaintiff:
Luis Rodriguez
Defendant:
Sean Bubnis , Samuel Geddes , Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Chrysler et al
as 6:2011cv00967
Plaintiff:
Tyreik S. Carter
Defendant:
Mark Chrysler , Richard Roe , The County of Oneida, New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. The City of Utica, New York et al
as 6:2010cv01539
Plaintiff:
Shatasha Brown
Defendant:
The City of Utica, New York , Peter Paladino , Anthony Stucchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cannistraci v. Kirsopp et al
as 1:2010cv00980
Plaintiff:
Sebastiano Cannistraci
Defendant:
Rodger Kirsopp, John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connally v. Doe et al
as 9:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jed Connally
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKim et al v. County of Rensselaer et al
as 1:2009cv00650
Plaintiff:
Colleen McKim, Colleen McKim, Larry Aaron and others
Defendant:
County of Rensselaer, Hon. Jack Mahar, Rensselaer County Deputy Sheriffs John Doe and Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
DeGroote v. City of Troy et al
as 1:2009cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jan DeGroote
Defendant:
City of Troy, Henry Tutunjian, Thomas O. Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. DOE et al
as 6:2009cv00303
Plaintiff:
Dustin Brown
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE and The County of Oneida, New York
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
