Cases 1 - 10 of 17
A.K.J. et al v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
A. K. J. and Keyana Gaines
Defendant:
Richard Roundtree, Leslie Gaiter, Richard Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sheppard v. Russell et al
as 1:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kathey Sheppard
Defendant:
Richard Russell and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUSSELL v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2022cv05320
Plaintiff:
RICHARD RUSSELL
Defendant:
BOB JOHNSON, AARON GOLEMAN, WALMART, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Richmond County et al
as 1:2020cv00159
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Richmond County, Does 1 - 5 and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VILLENEUVE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv78711
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD RUSSELL VILLENEUVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUSSELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv48088
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD RUSSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUSSELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv92485
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD RUSSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv63531
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD RUSSEL CONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUSSELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv28070
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL and RICHARD RUSSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard Russell v. Florida Department of Correcti
as 15-12763
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD RUSSELL
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
