Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Hernandez v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv02609
Petitioner:
Efrin Hernandez
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, State of Colorado, Department of Corrections, Aristedes W. Zavaras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Firth v. Smelser, et al
as 10-1292
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT FIRTH
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD SMELSER and JOHN W. SUTHERS
Fogle v. Smelser, et al
as 10-1291
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD JENNINGS FOGLE
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD SMELSER and JOHN W. SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Graham v. Smelser et al
as 1:2010cv01480
Petitioner:
Paul Robert Graham
Respondent:
Richard Smelser and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGregor v. Smelser
as 1:2010cv01387
Petitioner:
Gary W. McGregor
Respondent:
Richard Smelser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fogle v. Smelser et al
as 1:2010cv00932
Petitioner:
Ronald Jennings Fogle
Respondent:
Richard Smelser and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baird v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2010cv00537
Plaintiff:
Randolph Stephen Baird
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Crowley County Correctional Facility , Richard (I) Smelser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kersh v. Smelser et al
as 1:2010cv00090
Petitioner:
Lionel Kersh
Respondent:
Richard Smelser and John William Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giller v. Smelser et al
as 1:2010cv00084
Petitioner:
Oliver Giller
Respondent:
Richard Smelser and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Firth v. Smelser et al
as 1:2009cv03000
Petitioner:
Scott Firth
Respondent:
Richard Smelser and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
