Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Riddick v. OBrien et al
as 7:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
Megan OBrien, Anne Rene, Megan Kasper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddick v. VDOC et al
as 7:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
VDOC, Randall C. Mathena, Attorney Generals Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Jamison v. Mark Herring
as 23-6549
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL W. JAMISON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK HERRING, Former Attorney General of Virginia, individual capacity, RICHARD VORHIS, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Justice Division of VA, individual capacity and STACIE A. SESSOMS, Assistant Attorney General of VA, individual capacity
Jamison v. Herring et al
as 3:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
Mark Herring, Richard Vorhis and Stacie Sessoms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-6674
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN IVAN GILMORE, Chief Warden, COUNSELOR R. BRITT, ANGELA WETHINGTON, Operations Manager/PREA Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Petersburg Circuit Court
as 21-6662
Defendant / Appellee:
BENJAMIN RATZ, JOSEPH M. TEEFY, Judge, ATTORNEY TERRY DRISKILL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Kevin Krebs
as 21-6657
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD VORHIS, Assistant Attorney General, SUPERINTENDENT, Virginia State Police, MARK HERRING, Virginia Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Meyers v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2020cv00444
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Joseph Walters, QMHP - Ms. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
