Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Dutcher v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Dutcher
Defendant:
Anne Precythe, Jason Lewis, Travis Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Officer Richardson et al
as 2:2023cv04100
Plaintiff:
Branden De'Shawn Willis
Defendant:
Officer Richardson, Cpt. Jenny Atwell, Sherriff Dawyne Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Majors v. Lewis et al
as 4:2022cv01182
Plaintiff:
Dillonger John Majors
Defendant:
Jason Lewis, Paul Blair, Brian Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. USA
as 6:2022cv03275
Petitioner:
Douglas A. Richardson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McCartney v. Curl et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Rick L McCartney
Defendant:
Chase Curl, Zack Sebree, Aaron Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copeland v. Hefner et al
as 1:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Richardson Copeland
Defendant:
Carl Hefner and Andy Holder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darden v. St. Louis Airport and City Dept. et al
as 4:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Dominique Darden
Defendant:
St. Louis Airport and City Dept., Lt. Unknown Thomas, Lt. Unknown Bruce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Enloe v. Krohn et al
as 2:2021cv00069
Plaintiff:
James Enloe and Joshua James Enloe
Defendant:
Matthew M. Krohn, Brian Keedy, Kevin Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Krueger
as 6:2021cv03149
Respondent:
J E Krueger
Petitioner:
Albert L. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hamilton v. Morgan County, Missouri et al
as 2:2020cv04076
Defendant:
Peggy Richardson, Office of Prosecuting Attorney, Morgan County, Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Revious Leon Hamilton, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
