Cases 1 - 10 of 1,857
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Vaughan et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03084
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Vaughan, Dominic Pagliuso, Ralph Hensley II and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Richardson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06231
Plaintiff:
Jason Lamont Richardson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cohen v. Tepper et al
as 2:2024cv02460
Plaintiff:
Martin Leonard Cohen
Defendant:
Stanley H. Tepper, Alan R. Tepper, Walter A. Koprowski and others
Interested Party:
US Attorney for the E. District of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Smith v. Johnson et al
as 5:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Bishme Smith
Defendant:
Teresa Johnson, Michelle Folino, Renee Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
